Since she first burst onto the “Keep the White House White” a/k/a “Birther Movement” scene, Orly Taitz has been losing a pitched battle. From “acting a s a”prosecutor” for so-called “Citizen Grand Juries” accusations of forgery and fraud to “copyrighting” post made up of other people’s comments or emails, she keeps metaphorically cutting herself in a bid for attention. Her current pattern of continual motion filing is similar to the tactic she took when suing the day school her son was expelled from for allegedly cheating. I presume she used a similar tact with all the other lawsuit she found herself involved in as a landlord and as a dentist.
What I find intriguing, is the lack of interest in her background. We know more about Barack Obama, than we do her. I have written the Hebrew University regarding her attendance, and they will not (cannot?) divulge her matriculation date and degree without her leave and say so, and her student ID number. I should add, that the Israeli equivalent of a DDS takes six years. Highly unlikely if she emigrated in 1981 and came to the USA in May of 1987 (note, no date is given for her arrival in Israel, just the year, while her date of leaving is given in full). Taft University, likewise has failed to answer my request as to the veracity of her attendance. Taft is a “correspondence” law school, which means, Taitz had little or no face to face interaction with her professors. Taft also requires an entry essay as part of the application process. Even giving leave that for Dr. Taitz English is a second language, her writing skills are not at a level that wold gain her entry into the school. Yet the “Birther Movement” seems singularly unconcerned with the lack of information about their self-appointed leader. Could it be, that it is because she looks like them? That she knows what buttons to push?
Taitz looked a (minor) victory in the face and opted for defeat. When Judge Malihi offered her a default judgement, she said “NO!!!! I WANT TO PRESENT MY EVIDENCE”. This continual refusal to face reality of the lack of credibility of her poorly worded motions is the equivalent of cutting, and she finding fewer places to cut. So much so, that she seems to have now embraced the Sovereign Citizens Movement quite fully in her latest “blog link”.
When you feel everyone is conspiring against you, what would you call it?
The Jeering Section 
6 previous US Presidents had foreign born parents. Andrew Jackson (1829-1837) is the only president born of two immigrants, both Irish. Presidents with one immigrant parent are Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809), whose mother was born in England, James Buchanan (1857-1861) and Chester Arthur (1881-1885), both of whom had Irish fathers, and Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921) and Herbert Hoover (1929-1933), whose mothers were born respectively in England and Canada.
Obama will be the 7th US President with at least one foreign born President, since his father was a Kenyan native. His mother was born in Kansas.
Andrew Jackson (1829-1837) – There was no U.S. State of South Carolina when he was born, it was a British Colony at the time.
Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809) – SAME
There was NO Article 2 when these two were born.
James Buchanan (1857-1861) – The Buchanan’s (both parents) were citizens of Pennsylvania
Chester Arthur (1881-1885) – Born in 1829, his father did not become a U.S. Citizen until 1843. His Presidency was completely illegal according to the Supreme Law of the United States of America, the Constitution!
Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921) – Wilson’s mother became a “citizen of the United States” when she married her husband who was a “citizen of the United States.”
Herbert Hoover (1929-1933) – Hoover’s mother became a “citizen of the United States” when she married her husband who was a “citizen of the United States.
Barrack Obama (2009 – present) – Obama was born to a non-U.S. citizen father who never became a U.S. citizen. His Presidency is completely illegal according to the Supreme Law of the United States of America, the Constitution!
WE CANNOT ALLOW THIS ONE TO STAND!!!!!!!!!
So, exactly what are you trying to say?
In 1776, Samuel Adams said this: “If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.”
Vain and Aspiring men and women that possess seats in government,
WE THE PEOPLE have reached our saturation point with our public servants and the corruption that runs rampant amongst them. The violation of Fiduciary trust has gone beyond questionable activities amongst a few and grown to an undeniable level of blatant Treason for which each and every one of you is GUILTY.
We, the concerned people of the United States of America, who come from all walks of life and educational backgrounds and span all Parties and age groups, have found common ground and are committed to exposing the criminals at all levels of our government. We are the disenfranchised and betrayed U.S. People with no true representatives in our failed Federal Government.
While we are struggling and screaming at the top of our lungs; each of you continue to violate us, our country, our Constitution, our future and your SWORN OATH.
6 previous US Presidents had foreign born parents. Andrew Jackson (1829-1837) is the only president born of two immigrants, both Irish. Presidents with one immigrant parent are Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809), whose mother was born in England, James Buchanan (1857-1861) and Chester Arthur (1881-1885), both of whom had Irish fathers, and Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921) and Herbert Hoover (1929-1933), whose mothers were born respectively in England and Canada.
Obama will be the 7th US President with at least one foreign born President, since his father was a Kenyan native. His mother was born in Kansas.
Andrew Jackson (1829-1837) – There was no U.S. State of South Carolina when he was born, it was a British Colony at the time.
Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809) – SAME
There was NO Article 2 when these two were born.
James Buchanan (1857-1861) – The Buchanan’s (both parents) were citizens of Pennsylvania
Chester Arthur (1881-1885) – Born in 1829, his father did not become a U.S. Citizen until 1843. His Presidency was completely illegal according to the Supreme Law of the United States of America, the Constitution!
Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921) – Wilson’s mother became a “citizen of the United States” when she married her husband who was a “citizen of the United States.”
Herbert Hoover (1929-1933) – Hoover’s mother became a “citizen of the United States” when she married her husband who was a “citizen of the United States.
Barrack Obama (2009 – present) – Obama was born to a non-U.S. citizen father who never became a U.S. citizen. His Presidency was completely illegal according to the Supreme Law of the United States of America, the Constitution!
WE CANNOT ALLOW THIS ONE TO STAND!!!!!!!!!
Please point to the section of the Constitution that says Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen because his father was not a US Citizen (hint: it’s not there). For that matter, everything you say about “citizenship” is pulled straight out of your ass and has no relationship to law or reality.
So, do you want to be thought of as a birther bigot, or a birther idiot?
apparently, he qualifies as all three.
All babies born of at least one U.S. Citizen parent and another parent that is legally in this country, even if temporary, that is born on U.S. Soil is eligible to run for President of the United States of America and be the Commander and Chief of our military.
This is so ignorant of what the Natural Born Citizen clause in Article 2, and ONLY there, is for.
If NBC and citizen where supposed to be the same, the clause and the debate to include it would have never occurred!
To allow a visiting agent of let’s say Iran or a bunch of agents to enter our country legally, knock-up a bunch of U.S. Citizen women, go back to Iran for 14 years, come get thier offspring and indoctrinate them until, let’s say, 30 and when they reach 35 they are eligible to be the President is beyond ignorance and borders on stupidity!
It is this kind of education that will destroy the Republic!
You realize Orly Taitz ‘ eldest is not eligible To be president. As he wasn’t born of 2 citizens parents? He anchored her.
At 21 years old he his not eligible anyway! Your point is???
Correct though, NO anchor baby can ever be President of the United States of America or Commander and Chief of its military! As long as Political Correctness does not destroy our Republic! A Republic form by the Constitution.
Your argument regarding President Obama is invalid, as his father never became a citizen. President Obama is a NBC. But, it’s nice to know that you are the first non-bigot “birther” I have met. Although, I must ask, are you a naturalized citizen? your sentence structure implies that English is not your first language.
A Rat Called Tandem.
What happened in Georgia is what we refer to in poker as, “playing to a script”. It’s like something out of a Frank Capra movie. The citizens head to court to fix a Constitutional wrong, and the State court appears to be tough on the feds, standing up to them bravely flexing their muscles in the name of their citizens. Nice script. But it’s so very transparent.
Everyone needs to read Mario Apuzzo’s in-depth exposure of the blatant flaws in Judge Malihi’s holding, wherein you will experience a brilliant researcher exposing a truly defective legal opinion.
I only have a little bit to add. My remarks will be brief, and focused upon Judge Malihi’s sad failure to address the issue of statutory construction, which I explained thoroughly in my last report, The Dirty “little” Secret of the Natural-Born Citizen Clause Revealed.
Malihi’s opinion directly contradicts his own recent opinion denying Obama’s Motion to Dismiss, wherein Malihi relied exclusively on statutory construction. However, yesterday, Malihi held that the 14th Amendment had to be read “in tandem” with Article 2, Section 1.
But doing so would render the natural-born citizen clause to be inoperative, in that 14th Amendment citizenship, and nothing more, would be the requirement to be President. This would mean that the natural-born citizen clause is rendered superfluous. Here’s what Chief Justice Marshall said about this issue in Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803):
“It cannot be presumed that any clause in the constitution is intended to be without effect; and therefore such construction is inadmissible, unless the words require it.” Id. 174. (Emphasis added.)
And here’s what the U.S. Supreme Court held as to statutory construction in the seminal case on this issue, Morton v. Mancari:
“Where there is no clear intention otherwise, a specific statute will not be controlled or nullified by a general one, regardless of the priority of enactment. See, e. g., Bulova Watch Co. v. United States, 365 U.S. 753, 758 (1961); Rodgers v. United States, 185 U.S. 83, 87 -89 (1902).
The courts are not at liberty to pick and choose among congressional enactments, and when two statutes are capable of co-existence, it is the duty of the courts, absent a clearly expressed congressional intention to the contrary, to regard each as effective. “When there are two acts upon the same subject, the rule is to give effect to both if possible . . . The intention of the legislature to repeal `must be clear and manifest.’ ” United States v. Borden Co., 308 U.S. 188, 198 (1939).” Morton v. Mancari, 417 U.S. 535, 550-551 (1974).
There is no “clearly expressed intention” to deem 14th Amendment citizens “natural born”. Those words were intentionally left out of the 14th Amendment. And Judge Malihi has simply overruled the U.S. Supreme Court by suggesting that the general citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment governs the specific requirement to be President in Article 2, Section 1.
Both clauses are not given separate effect by Malihi. His opinion holds that the 14th has the exact same effect as the natural-born citizen clause, while the 14th Amendment does not include the words “natural born Citizen”. Persons claiming citizenship under the 14th Amendment are deemed to be “citizens”. Malihi has added the words “natural born” into the Amendment. This is absolutely forbidden, according to Malihi’s own opinion in the Motion to dismiss, wherein he held:
“In the absence of words of limitation, words in a statute should be given their ordinary and everyday meaning.’ Six Flags Over Ga. v. Kull, 276 Ga. 210, 211 (2003) (citations and quotation marks omitted). Because there is no other ‘natural and reasonable construction’ of the statutory language, this Court is ‘not authorized either to read into or to read out that which would add to or change its meaning.’ ” (Emphasis added.)
Yeah, dude. Whatevah. Such lack of consistency, just weeks apart, from the same jurist… simply reeks. Now he’s putting words into the 14th Amendment, when just two weeks ago he said that was forbidden.
You really need to start your own blog, my friend.
OH! Just so you know, I know you did not learn this in our piss poor education system, if there is not a “section” that says something in the Constitution, that “something” belongs to the states and the people respectively! Thought you might aught to know that.
Dear :Janke” Patriot, You are aware of the US Code, right? and, your last sentence makes little sense. might “aught”?